Articles

John 6 begins with Jesus feeding five thousand people and ends with many of his disciples walking away. Between those scenes Jesus gives the Bread of Life discourse, in which he says some of the most debated words in the Gospels about who comes to him and why. “All those whom the Father gives me will come to me” (6:37). “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him” (6:44). For Reformed readers, these sayings are among the clearest statements of unconditional election and effectual grace in the New Testament. Arminian readers take them just as seriously and read them as teaching that no one comes to Christ without God’s prior grace, a grace that draws but does not compel. This article walks through the discourse and the main points of difference.

The setting

The crowd that Jesus fed follows him across the lake, and he tells them that they are looking for him because they ate the loaves, not because they understood the sign. He urges them to work for the food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give. When they ask what work God requires, he answers that the work of God is to believe in the one God has sent (6:29). The rest of the chapter turns on that call to believe and on the crowd’s failure to do so.

Both traditions agree that the chapter is an invitation and a warning. Jesus offers himself as the bread from heaven, and he expects his hearers to come and believe. He also exposes the unbelief of people who have seen signs and still do not trust him. The debate concerns what Jesus says about the reasons some believe and others do not.

“All those whom the Father gives me”

In verse 37 Jesus says, “All those whom the Father gives me will come to me. He who comes to me I will in no way throw out.” He continues in verse 39: “This is the will of my Father who sent me, that of all he has given to me I should lose nothing, but should raise him up at the last day.”

Reformed interpreters see a definite group whom the Father has given to the Son, and they note that everyone in this group “will come.” The giving comes first and the coming follows. Jesus also promises to lose none of them and to raise them up at the last day. Reformed theology finds here unconditional election, effectual calling, and the perseverance of the saints in a few sentences. The second half of verse 37 adds a warm assurance: anyone who comes will be received.

Arminian interpreters agree that the Father gives people to the Son, but they ask who those people are. Many argue that in John’s Gospel the ones the Father gives are those who already belonged to God by faith and responsiveness to his earlier revelation. In John 17:6, Jesus says of the disciples, “They were yours, and you have given them to me.” Arminians read this as describing faithful Israelites who were already responsive to the Father and whom he then directed to the Son. Others read the giving in light of verse 40: “This is the will of the one who sent me, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life.” On this reading, the Father’s will is that believers be saved, and the ones given are those who believe.

“No one can come unless the Father draws him”

The crowd grumbles, and Jesus responds in verse 44: “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him; and I will raise him up in the last day.” Verse 45 continues: “It is written in the prophets, ‘They will all be taught by God.’ Therefore everyone who hears from the Father and has learned, comes to me.”

Both traditions agree that this verse teaches human inability. No one can come to Christ by natural power alone. The Remonstrants affirmed this in 1610, teaching that a person in the state of sin cannot of himself think, will, or do anything truly good, including saving faith, without being born again of God in Christ. Wesley taught the same through his doctrine of prevenient grace. The disagreement is about the nature and extent of the drawing.

Reformed readers argue that the drawing is effective. The one who is drawn is the one whom Jesus will raise up at the last day, so the drawing cannot be given to everyone, since not everyone will be raised to life. Verse 45 confirms this: everyone who has heard and learned from the Father comes. Reformed theologians describe this as effectual calling, in which God renews the heart so that the sinner comes freely. Verse 65 adds, “no one can come to me, unless it is given to him by my Father.”

Arminian readers argue that the drawing is necessary but resistible. They point to John 12:32, where Jesus says, “And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself.” The same verb for drawing is used there, and the scope is all people. If drawing always resulted in salvation, John 12:32 would teach universalism, which neither tradition accepts. Arminians therefore conclude that God draws everyone through the cross and the Spirit, and that those who come are those who do not resist that drawing. Verse 45, in their reading, describes those who listen and learn: the teaching is offered to all, and those who hear and learn come.

Reformed readers respond that “all people” in John 12:32 refers to people of every kind, Jews and Greeks, since the verse follows the arrival of Greeks seeking Jesus. They also note that the drawing in John 6:44 is joined to the promise of resurrection, which does not fit a drawing that many resist.

The bread and the flesh

The middle of the discourse focuses on eating Christ’s flesh and drinking his blood. Both traditions read this as a vivid image of faith, union with Christ, and dependence on his sacrificial death. Christians differ about the connection between these words and the Lord’s Supper, but that question cuts across the Arminian and Reformed divide rather than following it. Both traditions agree that the one who feeds on Christ by faith has eternal life.

Many disciples turn back

After the discourse, “many of his disciples went back and walked no more with him” (6:66). Jesus had said that some of them did not believe, and John adds that Jesus knew from the beginning who did not believe and who would betray him.

Reformed readers see this as the outworking of the earlier teaching. Those who left were never given by the Father, and their departure shows it. This parallels 1 John 2:19: “They went out from us, but they didn’t belong to us.” Jesus‘ foreknowledge of Judas shows that the outcome was no surprise to him.

Arminian readers see the departure as a real choice by people who had followed Jesus for a time. They were called disciples, they had seen his signs, and they chose to stop following him when his teaching became hard. Arminians note that Jesus’ question to the Twelve, “You don’t also want to go away, do you?” (6:67), assumes that leaving was possible. Peter’s reply, “Lord, to whom would we go? You have the words of eternal life” (6:68), is a confession of faith that the Twelve are invited to make and keep making.

Assurance in the discourse

Both traditions draw comfort from John 6. Reformed readers find assurance in Jesus' promise to lose none of those the Father has given him. The security of believers rests on the will of the Father and the faithfulness of the Son, not on the strength of the believer’s grip. Arminian readers find assurance in the promise that anyone who comes will never be cast out. No one who comes to Christ will be turned away, and anyone who hears this invitation may come.

Common ground and continuing questions

The two traditions agree that no one comes to Christ without God’s grace, that Christ receives everyone who comes, that faith is necessary, and that those who believe will be raised at the last day. They disagree about whether God’s drawing is given to all or only to some, whether it can be resisted, and whether the Father’s giving precedes faith or corresponds to it.

The disagreement often comes down to how John 6:37–45 relates to John 12:32 and to the many invitations in John’s Gospel to believe. Reformed readers think the effective drawing of John 6 explains why some believe in response to the invitations. Arminian readers think the universal drawing of John 12 explains how anyone who hears the invitation can respond. Readers in both traditions can agree with Peter that there is no one else to go to, because Jesus has the words of eternal life.