Wesley and Arminius sound like the Reformed on Genesis 6. “It repented the Lord” is after the manner of men. It does not disturb the eternal mind or rewrite God’s purpose. It speaks a change of his way because man had changed. Immutability, for Arminius, is a mode of the essence: no alteration, no increase, no decrease. 2 Timothy 2:13 is the pastoral sentence: he cannot deny himself; his word cannot fail.
Prayer is not wasted on an unchanging God. The sameness is the reason prayer has a place: the Father who invited yesterday still invites today. Conditional warnings and promises are not God experimenting; they are the stable holy will meeting changing creatures. Titus 1’s God who never lies is the God who appointed a gospel “before the ages began.”
Pastoral Arminian notes refuse two caricatures: a God who is still becoming, and a God so fixed that repentance and petition cannot meet an answer. The fork with the Reformed, if any, is not whether God changes in essence. It is whether an unchanging counsel includes a resistible mode of grace, or whether immutability is recruited to make every outcome necessary.
Calvin’s Genesis 6 is the classic Reformed handling: repentance cannot belong to God properly, because nothing is unforeseen. The Spirit accommodates himself to our capacity so that we feel how God hates sin. Westminster puts “immutable” next to “without passions” and then says he works by an immutable will. Calvin on 2 Timothy 2:13 turns the same attribute against apostasy: Christ does not swerve; deserters take nothing from him.
Romans 11’s irrevocable gifts sit with 1 John’s God who is light. Unchangeable holiness is why sin is still sin; unchangeable mercy is why the gospel does not expire. Prayer, on this reading, is itself inside the immutable counsel—second causes established, not bypassed. God does not change his mind because we informed him of something he missed.
Pastoral Reformed notes use immutability for sleep in a world of moods. The God you trusted in the dark is the same God in the morning. They also warn against a stoic freeze: the confession is not that God is inert, but that he is faithful. The fork with Arminians is not Genesis 6. It is whether that unchanging will has already determined who will finally believe.
Key contrast Both confess that God does not change in being or character, and both read relenting texts as a change of dealing rather than a mutable essence. Prayer is not wasted. Any remaining fork is whether an unchanging counsel includes resistible grace, not whether God is still becoming.