Passage

Genesis 14

Verses 1–12 WEB Voices

After Lot settled toward Sodom, a coalition of eastern kings raids Canaan. Five cities of the plain revolt, lose in the Valley of Siddim, and Lot is carried off with Sodom’s goods—kinship and location catching him in a war he did not start.

Genesis 14:1

1In the days of Amraphel, king of Shinar; Arioch, king of Ellasar; Chedorlaomer, king of Elam; and Tidal, king of Goiim,

Arminian

The narrator opens with named kings and dated “days.” History is not a fog. Empires move, and the promised household will soon feel their reach. Grace does not nullify the world’s wars; it meets people inside them.

Those in Wesley’s line hear a stage, not a fable. These rulers act with agency—ambition, alliance, invasion. God’s care for Abram and Lot will not erase the moral weight of what kings choose to do.

Reformed

Four named kings locate the story in providence, not myth. Shinar, Elam, and the rest are tools in a larger map: the Lord who called Abram still rules the nations that never heard his name.

Even pagan chronology is the Lord’s. “In the days of” is not secular leftover; it is the setting in which God will soon raise Abram as Lot’s deliverer.

Genesis 14:2

2they made war with Bera, king of Sodom; Birsha, king of Gomorrah; Shinab, king of Admah; Shemeber, king of Zeboiim; and the king of Bela (also called Zoar).

Arminian

War is made—chosen. Five cities of the plain, including Sodom where Lot dwells, stand against the four. The names are grim; the conflict is human. Lot’s neighborhood is now a battlefield he helped choose by settling there.

Location is a moral decision with public costs. Grace had offered him Canaan beside Abram; he took the valley. The war does not invent that choice; it exposes it.

Reformed

The cities of the plain are named as combatants. God already knows Sodom’s later fire; for now He lets pride and tribute-war run their course.

Lot is not the author of this coalition, yet providence has parked him inside it. The Lord will use even this raid for the household of promise.

Genesis 14:3

3All these joined together in the valley of Siddim (also called the Salt Sea).

Arminian

Forces join in a valley later known as the Salt Sea. Geography is memory: the place of this battle will become a monument of judgment. Joining forces is a political act.

Classical Arminians note that coalitions can be righteous or ruinous. Here the plain’s kings gather to throw off a yoke; the narrator does not baptize the revolt as holy.

Reformed

The Valley of Siddim is identified with the Salt Sea—later readers already know the end of this country. Providence writes the footnote in advance.

The map itself will preach. God who names seas and valleys is not surprised by this muster.

Genesis 14:4

4They served Chedorlaomer for twelve years, and in the thirteenth year they rebelled.

Arminian

Twelve years of service, then revolt. Tribute and rebellion are responsible political acts. The narrator records duration so we see patience, then a break they chose.

Yoke-shaking can be understandable and still disastrous. Agency differs from wisdom. The thirteenth year is their fork.

Reformed

Service under Chedorlaomer and the thirteenth-year revolt sit inside God’s government of nations. Powers rise and rebel under a hand higher than Elam.

Even unjust yokes are not outside providence. The revolt will pull Lot into captivity God already intends to reverse through Abram.

Genesis 14:5

5In the fourteenth year Chedorlaomer and the kings who were with him came and struck the Rephaim in Ashteroth Karnaim, the Zuzim in Ham, the Emim in Shaveh Kiriathaim,

Arminian

A year later the eastern kings return and roll through peoples of the east and south. The campaign is methodical, not a raid of chance. Human military skill is true—and so is the suffering it leaves.

Arminian readers refuse to call slaughter “fate.” These victories are chosen violence. The Lord can overrule them without making the invaders innocent.

Reformed

The fourteenth year belongs to the Lord as surely as the call of Abram. Rephaim, Zuzim, and Emim fall because God allows this coalition its hour.

The campaign’s sweep sets the board for Lot’s capture. Providence is not kind to every town; it is faithful to the promise.

Genesis 14:6

6and the Horites in their Mount Seir, to El Paran, which is by the wilderness.

Arminian

The war reaches Seir and the wilderness border. Distance does not hide anyone. Ambition travels until it is checked—here, not yet.

Expanding conquest is a moral trail. Each people defeated is a neighbor harmed. Grace will later limit this coalition through a household army, not through pretending the trail was holy.

Reformed

Hill country and wilderness mark the campaign’s reach. The Lord’s earth is wide, and these kings tramp it as if it were theirs.

Borders named in the text are still under the Possessor of heaven and earth, soon confessed in this same chapter.

Genesis 14:7

7They returned, and came to En Mishpat (also called Kadesh), and struck all the country of the Amalekites, and also the Amorites, that lived in Hazazon Tamar.

Arminian

They turn back toward Kadesh and strike Amalekite country and Amorites at Hazazon-tamar. The route now bends toward the plain—and toward Lot. Human strategy is closing a loop.

Listen here for warning in the geography. Lot’s valley is next because he placed himself in the path of powers he cannot manage.

Reformed

Turning back is still under appointment. Kadesh, Amalekites, Amorites—the Lord knows every people this army touches.

The noose tightens toward Sodom because God will both judge the plain and rescue a kinsman through Abram.

Genesis 14:8

8The king of Sodom, and the king of Gomorrah, the king of Admah, the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela (also called Zoar) went out; and they set the battle in array against them in the valley of Siddim

Arminian

The five go out to battle. They are not helpless civilians; they choose the field. Sodom’s king will later meet Abram as a beggar of persons, but here he still plays the warrior.

Going out is agency. The cities could have sought terms; they join battle. Lot’s safety now hangs on a fight his neighbors picked.

Reformed

Five kings take the field in Siddim. God lets the proud meet the stronger proud. The valley will not save them.

Reformed comfort for the church, not for Sodom: the Lord can humble cities without yet raining fire. This defeat is a first shock, and Lot is inside it.

Genesis 14:9

9against Chedorlaomer king of Elam, Tidal king of Goiim, Amraphel king of Shinar, and Arioch king of Ellasar; four kings against the five.

Arminian

Four against five: numbers do not equal righteousness. The larger local league still loses. Military math is not a moral verdict, but it is a test they fail.

Classical Arminians refuse both fatalism and triumphalism. The five could fight; they could also have walked another path years earlier. The ratio is history, not an excuse.

Reformed

Four against five is the narrator’s dry tally. God is not impressed by the extra king. Outcomes rest with Him, not with headcount.

The coalition that looks stronger locally is broken because the Lord has other purposes—for Lot, for Abram, and for a later, heavier judgment on the plain.

Genesis 14:10

10Now the valley of Siddim was full of tar pits; and the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah fled, and some fell there. Those who remained fled to the hills.

Arminian

Bitumen pits catch fleeing kings. The land they prized becomes a trap. Flight is panic, not repentance—yet it is still their motion.

Wealth’s landscape can swallow its owners. They chose the well-watered plain; its pits now take some of them. Grace still offers a different hill—the one Abram kept.

Reformed

Pits in the valley and flight to the hills are providence with irony. The rich floor of Siddim does not keep its kings.

God needs no extra miracle to humble Sodom here. Ordinary tar pits preach. The rest who reach the hills live to meet Abram—and to remain unthankful.

Genesis 14:11

11They took all the goods of Sodom and Gomorrah, and all their food, and went their way.

Arminian

Goods and food go with the victors. The cities are stripped. Possessions Lot once measured with his eyes now travel east as plunder.

Stuff cannot keep a man. The valley’s plenty is portable in the wrong direction. A different choice in chapter 13 would have left these herds beside Abram’s tents.

Reformed

The enemy takes all and goes. Providence permits total spoiling so that rescue, when it comes, is clearly the Lord’s doing through Abram.

Sodom’s wealth is never its security. God can empty a city in a day and still keep the promised line elsewhere intact.

Genesis 14:12

12They took Lot, Abram’s brother’s son, who lived in Sodom, and his goods, and departed.

Arminian

Lot is taken—kinsman of Abram, dweller in Sodom. The verse names both identities on purpose. He is family, and he is located where he chose to live. Captivity is not random; it follows residence.

Arminian interpreters hold together mercy and responsibility. Lot did not volunteer for chains, yet “lived in Sodom” was a resistible step. Shared ground: the God of promise still cares for this nephew, and the next verses will prove it.

Reformed

Lot, “Abram’s brother’s son,” is named so we cannot miss the covenant link. Dwelling in Sodom is his address; being Abram’s kin is why God will not leave him there as spoil.

The promise to Abram already has a long arm. Lot’s capture is severe mercy that will summon the Hebrew from Mamre. God keeps more than the named heir; He also retrieves the endangered kinsman.

Key contrast Both treat Lot’s capture as the cost of Sodom and as the concern of promise. Arminians press his responsible dwelling in the city as a live moral location; Reformed interpreters underline that kinship to Abram places him inside providence that will not let the raid have the last word.

Historic quotes

Voices from both camps

What older interpreters in each camp said about the war of the kings and Lot carried off from Sodom.

Arminian Notable voices

“The invaders were four kings; two of them no less than kings of Shinar and Elam—That is, Chaldea and Persia; yet probably not the sovereign princes of those great kingdoms, but rather the heads of some colonies which came out thence, and settled themselves near Sodom, but retained the names of the countries from which they had their original. The invaded were the kings of five cities that lay near together in the plain of Jordan, Sodom and Gomorrah, Admah, Zeboiim, and Zoar. [2.] The occasion of this war was, the revolt of the five kings from under the government of Chedorlaomer.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the Old Testament (on Gen 14:1)

Reformed Notable voices

“The history related in this chapter is chiefly worthy of remembrance, for three reasons: first, because Lot, with a gentle reproof, exhorted the men of Sodom to repentance; they had, however, become altogether unteachable, and desperately perverse in their wickedness. But Lot was beaten with these scourges, because, having been allured and deceived by the richness of the soil, he had mixed himself with unholy and wicked men.”
John Calvin · Commentary on Genesis (on Gen 14:1)

Quotations lightly abridged for length; wording follows standard English translations of the sources named.

Keep reading

Genesis, Psalms, Isaiah, Daniel, Matthew, John, Romans, Ephesians, Colossians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus, Hebrews, 1 John, 2 John, and 3 John are live

Browse verse-by-verse notes—Arminian and Reformed, side by side—kept fair and close to the text.

Browse the Bible