Passage

John 1

Verses 35–42 WEB Voices

Two of John’s disciples follow Jesus after “Behold the Lamb”; they come and see; Andrew finds Simon and brings him; Jesus names him Cephas.

John 1:35

35Again, the next day, John was standing with two of his disciples,

Arminian

The next day again: the Baptist keeps standing, keeps pointing. Two of his own disciples are with him. Classical Arminians see a teacher willing to lose followers to the Lamb. That is love, not failure.

Discipleship here is transferable. John does not clutch. The scene assumes hearers who can leave a good teacher for a better Lord. Grace uses yesterday’s witness again today.

Reformed

Again, the next day, John was standing with two of his disciples. Calvin: as John’s course nears its end, he labors to resign his office to Christ. God is shifting the church’s center from herald to Lord.

The smallness is deliberate. Two unknown men, a riverbank, a repeated word. Providence begins the gathering of a people without human pomp. The standing is ministry until the handoff is done.

John 1:36

36and he looked at Jesus as he walked, and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God!”

Arminian

He looked at Jesus as he walked: the Lamb is not a slogan but a man in motion. “Behold” is invitation. Look, that you may follow. The same cry as verse 29, now aimed at two who can actually walk after him.

Repeating the title is not redundancy. Hearts need more than one hearing. The call remains resistible; these two will not resist. Beholding is the first motion of a response.

Reformed

Behold the Lamb of God! Calvin: John directs attention to find in Christ the forgiveness of sins. The church’s beginning is this low and this clear.

The object of faith is named before any of them speaks. Christ walks; the herald looks and cries. Effectual grace will turn the cry into following, but the content is already the Lamb, not the disciples’ initiative.

John 1:37

37The two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus.

Arminian

They heard, and they followed. Wesley: they walked after him but had not the courage yet to speak. Arminians love the sequence: testimony heard, steps taken. Following is a human act enabled by the word they just received.

No one dragged them. John’s voice, Christ’s presence, and their feet meet. Prevenient grace is already at work in the hearing; the following is their answer, still shy, still true.

Reformed

The two heard him speak, and followed Jesus. Faith comes by hearing the appointed witness, and the Lord is already drawing. Hearing is not accidental; following is the fruit God intends.

Calvin will later say Christ presented himself that they might come. The initiative is layered: the Lamb walks, the herald cries, the Father’s purpose gathers. Their steps are no illusion; they are not self-started.

John 1:38

38Jesus turned and saw them following, and said to them, “What are you looking for?” They said to him, “Rabbi” (which is to say, being interpreted, Teacher), “where are you staying?”

Arminian

Jesus turned and saw them following. He does not wait for a polished speech. “What are you looking?” treats their desire at face value. They answer with Rabbi and a request to know where he stays—hunger more than a thesis.

The first words of Jesus in this Gospel are a question to seekers. He honors the approach. Grace meets those who come; it does not mock the timid. Staying with him is the next gift they ask.

Reformed

He does not wait until they address him; he asks, What do you seek? Calvin: this kind invitation, once made to two, now belongs to all. Yet it is Christ who turns first.

We need not fear that he will refuse access when he sees us coming—and we remember he seeks wanderers before they seek him. “Rabbi” is a first step; he will teach them who he is. The question draws out a desire he already knows.

John 1:39

39He said to them, “Come and see.” They came and saw where he was staying, and they stayed with him that day. It was about the tenth hour.

Arminian

Come and see. The promise is to those who come. Arminians hear an open invitation with a free condition of approach. They came, they saw, they stayed. Time of day is remembered because the day mattered to them.

Staying is more than a glance. Wesley would not have them satisfied with a passing look. The Lamb gives himself to be known. Remaining with him is the shape of believing.

Reformed

Come and see. Calvin: do not be satisfied with a passing look; seek his dwelling, that he may receive you as guests. Many smell the gospel at a distance and let Christ disappear.

The welcome is Christ’s word, and the staying is his gift as much as their steps. He instructed them that day so that they soon became devoted. “Come” is effectual in these two; the tenth hour marks a day God appointed.

John 1:40

40One of the two who heard John and followed him was Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother.

Arminian

Andrew is named as one who heard and followed. He will not keep the find. Faith that has received wants others to receive. The chain is personal, not mechanical.

Being “Simon Peter’s brother” is not yet a title of honor; it is a family bond about to become a mission. Grace uses ordinary kinship. Andrew’s next steps will be free, eager, and brotherly.

Reformed

Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, heard John and followed. Calvin: the Evangelist now shows how gradually the disciples were brought to Christ. God is assembling a people by his own order.

Naming Andrew in Peter’s shadow is already providence. The more eminent apostle will be reached through a less famous brother. The hearing-and-following is the Lord’s work through the Baptist’s word.

John 1:41

41He first found his own brother, Simon, and said to him, “We have found the Messiah!” (which is, being interpreted, Christ).

Arminian

He first found his own brother. Wesley: probably both of them sought him. “We have found” is the language of discovery after coming and seeing. The emphasis is on a find that Simon is now invited to share.

Messiah is named so that Simon can believe a specific claim, not a mood. Finding a brother is love’s haste. The same resistible, grace-enabled response offered to Andrew is now offered through Andrew.

Reformed

He first findeth Simon: We have found the Messiah. Calvin: faith does not conceal the light; Andrew has scarcely a spark, and with it he enlightens his brother. God determined that Peter would come by Andrew’s ministry.

“We have found” is true in experience and still sits under a prior finding by Christ. The title Messiah is God’s promise, not Andrew’s invention. The spark is gift; spreading it is the nature of that gift.

John 1:42

42He brought him to Jesus. Jesus looked at him and said, “You are Simon the son of Jonah. You shall be called Cephas” (which is by interpretation, Peter).

Arminian

He brought him to Jesus—the simplest mission. Jesus looks and names: Simon son of Jonah. You shall be called Cephas. Wesley: none had told our Lord these names; the look could not but strike Peter. The look is personal; the new name is vocation, not erasure of the man who must still follow.

Simon is truly brought; he must still receive the One he meets. The name Peter promises what grace will form, without turning Simon into a stone without a will. Bringing people to Jesus remains the church’s glad work.

Reformed

He brought him to Jesus. Calvin: Christ names him not from what he now is, but because he would make him Peter—a prediction of what he would give, magnifying grace. The obscure son of John will be a man of unshaken courage.

Cephas is Christ’s future tense. Steadfastness of faith is what the Lord will bestow, not what Simon contributes from an obscure house. The look that names is the look that makes a new man. Perseverance is already hidden in the nickname.

Key contrast Arminians stress Andrew’s initiative in finding and bringing Simon, and Simon’s meeting with Christ; the Reformed stress God’s purpose that Peter come by Andrew’s ministry and Christ’s grace that will make the stone—naming as gift, not as recognition of present strength.

Historic quotes

Voices from both camps

Classic comment on the first disciples who followed the Lamb and brought Simon to Jesus, from both sides of the debate.

Arminian Notable voices

“They followed Jesus — They walked after him, but had not the courage to speak to him. He first findeth his own brother Simon — Probably both of them sought him. Jesus said, Thou art Simon, the son of Jonah — As none had told our Lord these names, this could not but strike Peter. Cephas, which is Peter — Meaning the same in Syriac which Peter does in Greek, namely, a rock.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (on John 1:37, 41–42)

Reformed Notable voices

“The circumstance of Andrew immediately bringing his brother expresses the nature of faith, which does not conceal or quench the light, but rather spreads it in every direction. Andrew has scarcely a spark, and yet, by means of it, he enlightens his brother. We ought also to observe the purpose of God, which determined that Peter, who was to be far more eminent, was brought to the knowledge of Christ by the agency and ministry of Andrew. Christ gives a name to Simon, not from what is now perceived in him, but because he was to make him Peter. He now magnifies the grace which he determined afterwards to bestow upon him.”
John Calvin · Commentary on John (on John 1:40–42)

Quotations lightly abridged for length; wording follows standard English translations of the sources named.

Keep reading

Genesis, Psalms, Isaiah, Daniel, Matthew, John, Romans, Ephesians, Colossians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus, Hebrews, 1 John, 2 John, and 3 John are live

Browse verse-by-verse notes—Arminian and Reformed, side by side—kept fair and close to the text.

Browse the Bible