Passage

John 20

Verses 24–31 WEB Voices

Thomas missed Jesus’ first appearance and refuses to believe without touching the wounds. A week later Jesus offers exactly that, and Thomas makes the Gospel’s highest confession: ‘My Lord and my God!’ Jesus blesses those who believe without seeing, and John states his purpose: these signs are written so readers may believe and have life.

John 20:24

24But Thomas, one of the twelve, called Didymus, wasn’t with them when Jesus came.

Arminian

Thomas, one of the twelve, was not with them. Absence from the assembled church becomes the occasion of his famous unless. He is named Twin, numbered among the twelve, and missing the peace of verse 19.

Thomas’s absence from the gathering matters. The risen Lord came to a gathering Thomas did not attend. That is not fate’s prank; it is a choice with cost. Grace will come again, but the verse lets the absence stand as warning: do not wander from the brothers when the Lord is known to meet them.

Reformed

Calvin already: Thomas, like a wandering soldier, withdrew from the standard of union and was justly deprived of the favor given his brethren. The unbelief about to be told will confirm the godly by a hard example.

One of the twelve is not a charm against unbelief. Providence will overrule the absence for a second appearing, yet the absence is still his. The flock’s locked room was the appointed place; the Twin was not in it.

John 20:25

25The other disciples therefore said to him, “We have seen the Lord!” But he said to them, “Unless I see in his hands the print of the nails, put my finger into the print of the nails, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe.”

Arminian

The church preaches I have seen / we have seen the Lord—the same line Mary used. Thomas answers with unless and never: sight, finger, hand, or no faith. The testimony of the ten is refused. This is not modest caution; it is a self-issued veto.

He could have believed the witnesses. “I will not” is culpable, resistible stubbornness, not a missing decree that made faith impossible. The terms of Easter were already on the table. Grace will condescend to his demand, which does not make the demand righteous. A disciple can hear true testimony and still say never.

Reformed

Calvin: not only slow but obstinate. Dulness required that Christ again let them see and feel—proof added for Thomas and for us. The vice’s source: everyone wishes to be wise from his own understanding. “If I do not see and touch, I will not believe” has no approach to faith; it is sensual judgment. So it happens to all so devoted to themselves that they leave no room for the word of God. This wickedness is almost natural: to retard ourselves when the entrance to faith is opened.

The ten’s word should have been enough. Unbelief here is not a neutral research program. It is pride against the word, the same flesh that will need a bridle if it is not to fall entirely.

Key contrast Either reading: “We have seen the Lord” is sufficient testimony, and Thomas’s unless/never is blamed, not praised. Arminians hear an ability to have believed the brothers—willful refusal of light already given, which grace may still overcome without calling the refusal necessary. Reformed readers hear obstinacy almost natural to all, a sensual judgment that shuts out the word; God will use even this for confirming the godly, and will not let this elect disciple’s spark go finally out.

John 20:26

26After eight days, again his disciples were inside and Thomas was with them. Jesus came, the doors being locked, and stood in the middle, and said, “Peace be to you.”

Arminian

Eight days later—Wesley: the next Sunday. Thomas is with them now. Locked doors again; the same coming; the same Peace. The Lord keeps the Lord’s day appointment and includes the man who had said never.

A week of “I will not” did not bar the door Jesus walks through. Presence is mercy to a stubborn disciple who at least came back to the room. Peace is spoken to the group, Thomas included, before the wounds are offered. He is still addressable.

Reformed

Calvin: we have already spoken of the entrance and the salutation. Christ so readily yields to Thomas’s improper request, inviting him to feel, that we learn how earnestly he desired to promote Thomas’s faith and ours. Nothing might be wanting that was necessary for confirming faith.

Eight days is patience, not indifference. Locked doors still cannot keep him out. Peace first, then the confrontation. The Shepherd returns to the one sheep without abandoning the ten. Providence scheduled unbelief’s healing in the assembly, not in private empiricism.

John 20:27

27Then he said to Thomas, “Reach here your finger, and see my hands. Reach here your hand, and put it into my side. Don’t be unbelieving, but believing.”

Arminian

He offers exactly what Thomas demanded, then commands: Don’t be unbelieving, but believing. The imperative treats Thomas as a man who must now choose. Evidence is given; unbelief is still forbidden. The wounds are grace, not a concession that faith’s proper ground is touch.

Jesus does not say “wait until you are made to believe.” He says believe. The command is sincere. Condescension to weakness does not nullify responsibility. Thomas may still refuse; he is told not to.

Reformed

Calvin: Thomas’s stupidity was astonishing—not satisfied with beholding, he wanted his hands as witnesses; proud and contemptuous. Christ yields to what was asked through obstinacy, looking not only to Thomas but to us. When we honor the word less than we ought, a glowing obstinacy steals on us and blocks the gate of faith. We should restrain the wantonness of the mind.

The command Don’t be unbelieving, but believing is Christ’s word creating what it requires in the man he has come back for. Touch is accommodated; faith’s nature remains hearing. The elect disciple is not left to his veto. The very Lord who rebukes also gives the sight that breaks the never.

Key contrast Both: Jesus meets the demand and still rebukes unbelief; touch is mercy, not the definition of faith. Arminians detect a command to a man who can yet disbelieve or believe—responsible turning at the wounds. Reformed readers hear the same command as the Lord’s effectual reclaiming of an obstinate elect disciple, proof added for the church, while insisting faith must still originate in the word rather than in the finger.

John 20:28

28Thomas answered him, “My Lord and my God!”

Arminian

My Lord and my God! Wesley: the ten had said we have seen the Lord; Thomas now acknowledges him as Lord, as risen, and confesses his Godhead more explicitly than any yet—and all this without putting his hand to the side. The climax of the Gospel’s Christology lands in a convert’s mouth, not a treatise.

The confession is Thomas’s own answer, personal my, Trinitarian in force. He did not need the empiricism he had required. A will that said never now worships. That is repentance, not a puppet’s noise. The verse is a human yielding to the divine person who stood there.

Reformed

Calvin: Thomas awakes at length, late, as the mentally deranged when they come to themselves; abrupt language, shame compelling the cry, condemning his own stupidity. Faith was not wholly extinguished, only choked; from the signs he infers much more than they exhibited, because after deep sleep he comes to himself. The good seed, crushed, springs when obstructions are removed. God restrains his elect by a secret bridle and cherishes sparks he later kindles by the Spirit. Two clauses: Lord as Mediator and Head; then ascent to eternal divinity. By Christ Man we are conducted to Christ God. He twice says my—earnest, lively faith. Christ ratifies it; the passage refutes Arius; one Jesus Christ is God and Lord.

This is not touch discovering deity in a wound. It is the word remembered, divinity confessed, an elect man’s buried faith bursting into flame.

Key contrast Shared high Christology: Thomas calls the risen Jesus God, and the confession is true worship, not hyperbole. Arminians (Wesley) stress how explicit the Godhead-confession is, and that he made it without the touching he had demanded—a free, personal my. Reformed readers (Calvin) agree he may not have needed to touch, and add that the faith which seemed destroyed had been concealed in an elect heart, suddenly kindled; Lord then God is the path from the Mediator we can handle to the eternal divinity we must adore.

John 20:29

29Jesus said to him, “Because you have seen me, you have believed. Blessed are those who have not seen and have believed.”

Arminian

A question and a beatitude. Seen-and-believed is not nothing; not-seen-and-yet-believed is called blessed. The rest of the church—including every reader of this book—is in view. Faith may come by hearing (and, Wesley will say, sometimes by reading) without Thomas’s experiment.

The blessing is for those who credit the testimony. That is a possibility held out to later hearers. The verse does not mock Thomas so much as relocate blessedness onto the word received. You may believe without seeing; you are invited to.

Reformed

Calvin: Christ blames only that Thomas was so slow he needed to be violently drawn by the senses—at variance with faith’s nature. It was not mere touching that made him believe Christ is God; awakened, he recalled doctrine he had almost forgotten. Faith cannot flow from experimental knowledge of events; it must originate in the word. Blessed are they who have not seen and have believed: faith acquiesces in the bare word, does not depend on carnal views or human reason; it is demonstration of things unseen, and as soon as it passes beyond the word it ceases to be faith.

We who never beheld Christ with flesh enjoy this blessedness now, beholding him in the gospel as if he stood here. Believe when you do not see. The beatitude is the nature of faith, not a second-class prize.

Key contrast Later believers are not second-class; the greater blessedness is faith without Thomas’s sight. Arminians press the beatitude as a sincere invitation to all who hear or read—you may yet believe the testimony. Reformed readers press it as the definition of right faith: it rests on the word, not on the senses; Thomas was drawn more violently than faith’s nature requires, and we are taught to honor Scripture as enough.

John 20:30

30Therefore Jesus did many other signs in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book;

Arminian

Many other signs, not written here. Wesley: not written in this book of John, nor indeed of the other evangelists. The Gospel is a selection, not a vault of every miracle. What is written is enough for the purpose about to be named.

God is not stingy; John is selective. Curiosity that demands more signs before believing is the Thomas-error in literary form. The signs you have are for use.

Reformed

Calvin: without this caution readers might suppose a complete catalogue. John related some things out of a large number because these were sufficient to edify faith. The others were not unworthy or in vain—they profited that age—and it still matters that the gospel was sealed by a vast number of miracles, even those we do not now know minutely.

John’s record is sufficient, not exhaustive. Vain curiosity is about to be answered in verse 31. Signs serve faith; they are not an infinite dataset for the unappeasable.

John 20:31

31but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in his name.

Arminian

Purpose clause for the whole book: written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in his name. Wesley: that ye may be confirmed in believing; faith comes sometimes by reading, though ordinarily by hearing. The you is the reader. The end is faith and life, not speculation.

Arminian readers rest here without embarrassment: the book is a sincere means of faith for whoever reads. Christ, Son of God, life in his name—the same whoever as 3:16 and 20:29. Believing is the appointed way; life is in the name, not in extra signs. Writtenness is itself evangelistic: the Spirit uses the page so that people may believe, and they may refuse the page as Thomas first refused the ten. The purpose is not irony. John writes to be believed.

Reformed

Calvin: he committed to writing what ought to satisfy us, abundantly sufficient for confirming faith; he replies to men’s insatiable curiosity. He does not set aside the other Evangelists. Faith rests on the promises and word; miracles are aids and supports, preparing minds to reverence the word, not a rival foundation. These things written that we may believe so far as faith can be aided by signs. The Christ: such as promised in Law and Prophets, Mediator, highest Ambassador, Restorer. Son of God: not ordinary rank, not by adoption but by nature—eternal divinity; he who does not perceive Christ to be God after these proofs is blind at noonday. That believing, you may have life: to restrain foolish longings after more than is sufficient for obtaining life. We obtain eternal life by faith because out of Christ we are dead and are restored by his grace alone—through his name.

The book is enough. Life is by believing this Jesus, the Christ and natural Son, and that believing is the grace that raises the dead. Sufficiency of Scripture for faith and life is John’s own claim.

Key contrast John wrote selected signs so that readers may believe Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and have life in his name—not to feed curiosity. Arminians (Wesley) hear a sincere, reader-facing purpose: you may believe, even by reading; life is in the name for those who do believe; the book truly aims at the faith of whoever takes it up. Reformed readers (Calvin) hear the same you and the same sufficiency, and add that the writing confirms faith as the word’s own instrument, miracles as aids not grounds, the Son’s eternal divinity as what must be seen, and life as restoration by grace alone of those who were dead out of Christ. Neither side should flatten v. 31 into either “everyone automatically believes” or “the invitation is a feint.”

Historic quotes

Voices from both camps

Classic comment on Thomas’s demand, the confession My Lord and my God, and the purpose of the book, from both sides of the debate.

Arminian Notable voices

“And Thomas said, My Lord and my God—the disciples had said, We have seen the Lord. Thomas now not only acknowledges him to be the Lord, as he had done before, and to be risen, as his fellow disciples had affirmed, but also confesses his Godhead, and that more explicitly than any other had yet done. And all this he did without putting his hand upon his side. But these things are written that ye may believe—that ye may be confirmed in believing. Faith cometh sometimes by reading; though ordinarily by hearing.”
John Wesley · Explanatory Notes upon the New Testament (on John 20:28, 31)

Reformed Notable voices

“The unbelief of Thomas is related that by means of it the faith of the godly may be more fully confirmed. He was not only slow and reluctant to believe, but even obstinate. This wickedness is almost natural to all men, to retard themselves of their own accord when the entrance to faith is opened to them. Unless I see, says he, and if I do not touch, I will not believe: these words have no approach to faith, but a sensual judgment. Faith cannot flow from a merely experimental knowledge of events, but must draw its origin from the word of God. These are written, that you may believe: he committed to writing what ought to satisfy us, because it is abundantly sufficient for confirming our faith. We obtain eternal life by faith, because, while we are out of Christ, we are dead, and we are restored to life by his grace alone.”
John Calvin · Commentary on John (on John 20:24–31)

Quotations lightly abridged for length; wording follows standard English translations of the sources named.

Keep reading

Genesis, Psalms, Isaiah, Daniel, Matthew, John, Romans, Ephesians, Colossians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus, Hebrews, 1 John, 2 John, and 3 John are live

Browse verse-by-verse notes—Arminian and Reformed, side by side—kept fair and close to the text.

Browse the Bible