Passage

Psalms 137

Verses 1–9 WEB Voices

An exile lament By the rivers of Babylon: captives weep at the memory of Zion, hang lyres on the willows, and refuse to turn the LORD’s song into entertainment for tormentors. Vow follows—Jerusalem above highest joy—then appeal that God remember Edom’s cry to raze the city, and solemn judgment language against Babylon’s doom, including the hard closing line of retributive warfare. Both camps take the imprecation seriously as Scripture under exile grief, not as flippant revenge theater.

Psalms 137:1

1By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down. Yes, we wept, when we remembered Zion.

Arminian

Clarke: by rivers of captivity the exiles sat and wept at Zion remembered—grief for lost worship and home, not mere nostalgia for comfort.

Tears belong before God. Remembering Zion may still break the heart; honest lament is not unbelief, and grace does not mock the captive’s grief.

Reformed

Calvin: sitting marks prolonged burial in exile; even Babylon’s pleasant waters could not dry tears while they were cut off from God’s sanctuary on Zion.

Memory of Zion is memory of the LORD’s worship and promise. Affliction that should quicken faith must not be soothed away by pagan luxury.

Psalms 137:2

2On the willows in that land, we hung up our harps.

Arminian

Clarke: they unstrung instruments and hung them on willow bushes—music stopped under overwhelming distress.

Sometimes holiness refuses forced cheer. The lyre is not surrendered forever; it is set aside until praise can be true again.

Reformed

Calvin: suspension of temple song under chastisement; even refreshing shade could not heal a wound cut by the LORD’s displeasure.

Public praise may pause in mourning without denying God. The relics of worship are kept for restoration, not sold for Babylon’s amusement.

Psalms 137:3

3For there, those who led us captive asked us for songs. Those who tormented us demanded songs of joy: “Sing us one of the songs of Zion!”

Arminian

Clarke: captors requiring Zion’s song was as unreasonable as it was insulting—slavers demanding sacred mirth from the crushed.

Do not confuse obedience with performing religion for mockers. The songs of Zion are for the LORD, not for tormentors’ sport.

Reformed

Calvin: the worst affliction was blasphemous mockery aimed less at wounding exiles than at casting scorn on their God—“Is your God dead?”

When the world demands holy song as entertainment, refusal can be fidelity. The insult falls on Jehovah’s name, not only on Israel’s feelings.

Psalms 137:4

4How can we sing the LORD’s song in a foreign land?

Arminian

Clarke: How shall WE sing—exiles, stripped, insulted, in a heathen land? God does not expect mirth as spectacle for oppressors.

The LORD’s song has fitting place and heart. Integrity may withhold song when the request is cruelty dressed as culture.

Reformed

Calvin: a magnanimous answer—they abstain because the land is polluted; “foreign land” also hints the stay is temporary, Canaan still their sacred rest.

Refusal to coalesce with Babylon keeps hope of return alive. Separation here is loyalty to promised worship, not despair of God’s reach.

Psalms 137:5

5If I forget you, Jerusalem, let my right hand forget its skill.

Arminian

Clarke: forgetting Jerusalem would be tacit peace with bondage; better lose harp-skill than prostitute holy song to the ungodly.

Love of God’s city and ordinances outranks personal craft. Prefer Jerusalem’s good over the applause of captors.

Reformed

Calvin: solemn oath that Jerusalem stay engraved on the heart; if zeal for God’s house fades, let the musician’s hand forget its cunning.

Public calamity of the church should weigh heavier than private trial. Skill is gift; loyalty to Zion is vow.

Psalms 137:6

6Let my tongue stick to the roof of my mouth if I don’t remember you, if I don’t prefer Jerusalem above my chief joy.

Arminian

Clarke: prefer country, people, and God’s ordinances above every chief joy—or lose voice and melody. Grace-made free hearts speak thus under slavery.

Highest joy is recalibrated. Personal delight bows to the LORD’s place and people; that preference is piety, not mere nationalism.

Reformed

Calvin: set Jerusalem over the head of all joy—prosperity of the church as chief gladness, so her ruin shuts out lesser worldly joys.

Zeal for God’s house claims the top of the heart’s loves. Memory and preference are forms of faith under exile.

Psalms 137:7

7Remember, LORD, against the children of Edom in the day of Jerusalem, who said, “Raze it! Raze it even to its foundation!”

Arminian

Clarke: Edom joined Nebuchadnezzar and helped raze Jerusalem’s walls—brotherly cruelty remembered before God.

Appeal is to the LORD’s memory and justice, not to private vendetta. Name the wrong; leave the verdict with Him who judges nations.

Reformed

Calvin: not unadvised rage but herald of prior prophecy—God had promised to punish Edom; “Remember” strengthens faith to wait His timing.

Imprecation tracks God’s Word against a hardened ally of Babylon. Amendment would be desired for enemies generally; here Scripture had already closed the case.

Key contrast Both treat the cry against Edom as serious appeal to God’s justice, not casual spite. Arminian readers typically emphasize laying the injury before the LORD and refusing private revenge. Reformed Christians underline that the plea stands on God’s prior prophetic promise against a reprobate partner in Jerusalem’s fall—vengeance asked only where God had spoken.

Psalms 137:8

8Daughter of Babylon, doomed to destruction, he will be happy who repays you, as you have done to us.

Arminian

Clarke: Babylon the destroyer is herself to be ruined; blessed names God’s chosen agent (as Cyrus) who repays her measure—declarative providence, not a license for personal cruelty.

Lex talionis language confesses moral order. Oppression returns on the oppressor under God; the church does not invent a new ethic of hate.

Reformed

Calvin: faith sees Babylon’s fall while she still looks impregnable; blessing on the recompenser is not praise of Medo-Persian motives, but certainty that God-appointed judgment will succeed.

“Doomed” is already written in the Word. Happy is the instrument God uses; the empire’s pride does not nullify Jehovah’s sentence.

Psalms 137:9

9Happy shall he be, who takes and dashes your little ones against the rock.

Arminian

Clarke: the line states how hated Babylon’s oppression had become and what horrors would attend her sack—prophetic declaration of retributive providence, containing no excitement to barbarity; private prayers for enemies’ destruction as revenge are out of the question.

Hear exile grief and ancient war’s terror without flippancy or culture-war rant. The verse is hard because judgment on a violent empire is hard; Christians read it through the cross’s call to love enemies personally while still confessing that God judges nations and that Scripture may speak judgment language without baptizing our cruelty.

Reformed

Calvin: not personal feeling but authorized words of just judgment—measure for measure, as Isaiah foresaw infants dashed in Babylon’s fall; “happy” declares the reputed service of ending a universally oppressive power under God’s auspices.

Sit with the text’s severity. God had sentenced Babylon; the psalm voices that sentence in the warfare idiom of the day.

Key contrast Both refuse to caricature or dismiss the verse: it is Scripture’s judgment speech in exile grief, not a joke and not a license for private cruelty. Arminian readers, with Clarke, typically stress its declarative, prophetic character and explicitly bar revenge-prayer as personal excitement to harm. Calvin stresses that the psalmist speaks as herald of God’s already-promised sentence on Babylon—authorized talionic judgment, not unchecked passion—while still warning that Medo-Persian agents were not thereby made righteous in motive.

Historic quotes

Voices from both camps

Classic comment on exile tears, refused mockery-song, love of Jerusalem, and judgment on Edom and Babylon, from both sides of the debate.

Arminian Notable voices

“By the rivers of Babylon—captives held religious meetings on river banks. We hanged our harps upon the willows—a most affecting picture: reflecting on their country they unstrung their harps and gave loose to grief. How shall we sing the Lord’s song in a strange land?—Can WE, in this state of slavery, stripped of property, insulted by oppressors, in the land of heathens, sing? God does not expect it; it is base in our enemies to require it. If I forget thee, O Jerusalem—let me lose my skill if I prostitute holy song to please the ungodly. Remember the children of Edom—they joined Nebuchadnezzar and were instruments in rasing Jerusalem. O daughter of Babylon—Cyrus was God’s agent to repay her. Happy that taketh and dasheth thy little ones—so oppressive hast thou been as to become universally hated; those who have the last hand in thy destruction shall be reputed happy. These prophetic declarations contain no excitement to cruelty; they are simply declarative of what would take place in the retributive providence and justice of God. Praying for the destruction of our enemies, in the sense of private revenge, is totally out of the question.”
Adam Clarke · Commentary on the Bible (on Psalm 137)

Reformed Notable voices

“There was danger that the Jews cast off in so melancholy a manner should lose hold of their faith. The writer drew up a form of lamentation that by sighs and prayers they might keep alive the hope of deliverance, and warn against decline of godliness in an irreligious land. They sat by Babylon’s rivers and wept when they remembered Zion—tears of humility as well as distress, cut off from the worship of God. How shall we sing Jehovah’s song in a foreign land?—Chaldea was not worthy of that honor; they abstain as from polluted sacrifices, yet must be ready for return. If I forget thee, O Jerusalem—the zeal of God’s house should rise above private considerations. Remember the children of Edom—the Psalmist does not break forth unadvisedly, but as God’s herald confirming prophecy; to pray for vengeance would be unwarrantable had not God promised it against a reprobate party. O daughter of Babylon laid waste—he discerns coming judgment by the eye of faith. Happy he who dashes little ones upon the stones—he does not speak under impulse of personal feeling, but employs words God had authorized; this is declaration of just judgment answering measure for measure, as Isaiah had specially predicted of Babylon.”
John Calvin · Commentary on the Book of Psalms (on Psalm 137)

Quotations lightly abridged for length; wording follows standard English editions of the sources named.

Keep reading

Genesis, Psalms, Isaiah, Daniel, Matthew, John, Romans, Ephesians, Colossians, 1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus, Hebrews, 1 John, 2 John, and 3 John are live

Browse verse-by-verse notes—Arminian and Reformed, side by side—kept fair and close to the text.

Browse the Bible